Saturday, March 01, 2014
"Was vetoed Arizona bill misrepresented? Constitutional scholars weigh in"
In our sound bite society, with everyone shouting to make their point, it's really difficult to get the full unbiased story about almost anything.
Reading, and re-reading about an issue is an important and better method.
I think this is a good example of that...
Reading, and re-reading about an issue is an important and better method.
I think this is a good example of that...
In the Christian Science Monitor, Warren Richey tries to explain in a calm balanced manner:
"In a four-page letter sent this week to Brewer, the scholars said the Arizona law had been 'egregiously misrepresented by many of its critics.'
'Some of us are Republicans; some of us are Democrats. Some of us are religious; some of us are not. Some of us oppose same-sex marriage; some of us support it,' the letter said.
Nine of the signers of the letter said they supported the legislation; two were not sure. 'But all of us believe that many criticisms of the Arizona law are deeply misleading,' the letter said."
