Monday, September 20, 2010
What's in a name?
Historically, I think the maajority of "name" changes are intended to fool people.
The rebranding/renaming of things political have the same smell...
The rebranding/renaming of things political have the same smell...
FoxNews.com recently reported:
"The White House wants the public to start using the term "global climate disruption" in place of 'global warming' -- fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.
White House science adviser John Holdren urged people to start using the phrase during a speech last week in Oslo"
