Thursday, November 19, 2009
Barack Obama - vs the Clinton Coalition in 2010 and 2012
I think something is going on in America that seems to lean toward an epiphany that American values are seriously threatened.
More than a few citizens seem to be muttering, "What have we done?"
A candidate on a white horse with a strong belief in that "shining city on the hill" will get my support and my vote in a heartbeat...
More than a few citizens seem to be muttering, "What have we done?"
A candidate on a white horse with a strong belief in that "shining city on the hill" will get my support and my vote in a heartbeat...
HillBuzz.org recently acknowledged the character traits of George W. and Laura Bush. Now, there's this, along with much more that explains their reasoning:
"2012 entirely hinges on three things:
(1) the GOP running a candidate who turns out their base, so that few idiots sit at home 'to teach the GOP a lesson' because they believe the candidate is not conservative enough
(2) that candidate needs to talk only about creating jobs, lowering taxes, reining in spending, providing law and order, stabilizing the economy, securing energy independence for this country, protecting our citizens, and providing a solid education and path to a good future for our children. NO talk about social issues…no attacks on gays…no crusade on abortion…no fodder for the Race Industry
(3) balancing (1) and (2), the candidate needs to appeal to conservatives while standing tall and strong as someone Jacksonian Democrats, PUMAS, independent voters, and Clinton Moderates, whatever you want to call us, can get behind
Ladies and Gentlemen, that person is Sarah Palin.
If she goes for it, she’ll be the 45th President of the United States. "
