Friday, October 30, 2009
Judge dismisses California eligibility challenge
This is the latest (as of yesterday).
What the future will bring is anybody's guess.
It continues to fascinate me that so much about Obama's past is murky at best, and yet the old media won't touch it except to denigrate those who think it's important and want to know about it...
What the future will bring is anybody's guess.
It continues to fascinate me that so much about Obama's past is murky at best, and yet the old media won't touch it except to denigrate those who think it's important and want to know about it...
At WorldNetDaily, Bob Unruh reports on the ruling and also has this:
"Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation confirmed immediately that his clients – two of about four dozen in the case – would be filing an appeal. California attorney Orly Taitz, representing the rest of the clients, also promised not only an appeal of this decision, but future cases that will be filed.
'This [opinion] looks like it was written by the defense,' she told WND.
She described the fight against Obama as 'very tough.'
'He has more power than anybody, unlimited financial resources, and a lot to hide,' she said."
Comments:
<< Home
CARTER IN A NUTSHELL: Expanded Orly Taitz default judgment case against CANDIDATE Obama for fraud into a Presidential Removal case against PRESIDENT Obama (promising a trial), but then ruled the Court lacks said Presidential Removal authority, not only dismissing the Judge-expanded Presidential Removal case (reneging on the trial), but throwing out Orly's Candidate fraud case as well -- all this on a red herring that Orly's case was filed 1/20/09 after Obama was sworn in on 1/20/09 despite Obama was sworn in on 1/21/09 and despite the Orly-alleged fraud was committed by Candidate Obama prior to becoming President and for which there is no Presidential immunity in any case. Thus Judge Carter set up and knocked down his own straw man, and misstated fact and law to bury Orly's actual case. Pretty nifty!!!
Thank you for your comment.
I don't doubt that you have it right.
Unfortunately, it is likely that very few have the courage to take this on. So far, it appears that a zillions more time and effort has been expended trying to discredit those that want to see the CANDIDATE's credentials than has been spent considering the instructions of the Constitution.
I have a fear that this will be one of those things where the truth becomes known well after the time (decades?) that it has any consequence.
It's sad that no member of the media sees the thorough investigation of this as a path to fame and historical significance.
Post a Comment
I don't doubt that you have it right.
Unfortunately, it is likely that very few have the courage to take this on. So far, it appears that a zillions more time and effort has been expended trying to discredit those that want to see the CANDIDATE's credentials than has been spent considering the instructions of the Constitution.
I have a fear that this will be one of those things where the truth becomes known well after the time (decades?) that it has any consequence.
It's sad that no member of the media sees the thorough investigation of this as a path to fame and historical significance.
<< Home
