Saturday, September 20, 2008
"Ethics, The Left & The Associated Press"
"A". If we create a country with a majority of successful citizens, they will likely not object to taking care of those less fortunate.
"B". If we create a country with a majority of citizens dependent on federal handouts and entitlements, there won't be enough others to fund those programs.
It seems to me that one party favors one idea, while the other party favors the other. We all know which is which, and therefore, have the choice to vote for "A" or "B" above...
"B". If we create a country with a majority of citizens dependent on federal handouts and entitlements, there won't be enough others to fund those programs.
It seems to me that one party favors one idea, while the other party favors the other. We all know which is which, and therefore, have the choice to vote for "A" or "B" above...
At TheNewMediaJournal.us, Lance Fairchok, makes a case, and offers a hope:
"The disaster of Democrat control of the house and senate is nowhere as evident as in the financial crisis we now experience. The Democrats have diluted or prevented every reform and fiduciary standard brought to the table, protecting their cash cow in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae despite a long history of warnings. As usual, the citizens bail them out with billions of tax dollars.
...and citizens will realize their policies usually end up badly for the nation. The press will have its comeuppance also; its manipulations have grown so wearisome and so obvious even the inattentive cannot help but notice the slant. Change is coming, and soon, from the heartland, wearing heels and glasses, and ready to take on the fast-talking double-dealing Democrats. Hillary is staying quiet as she sees the meltdown coming. Obama can do nothing but posture and pander, insult and insinuate. His house of cards is coming down."
